The natural progression of SMA can be assessed by age- and ability-appropriate motor function scales and electrophysiological measurement of motor-unit health1,2
A number of motor function scales* have been developed that have proven useful in a range of settings, including:2-4
- Assessment of the natural history of SMA in clinical studies
- Establishment of a baseline in order to observe potential functional motor benefits of investigational therapeutic agents in clinical trials
*Below is not a comprehensive list of motor function scales.
MEASURE: MOTOR MILESTONES
INFANTS (2-24 months of age)
The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) is designed to be a simple and scorable method for evaluating infants from 2 months to 2 years of age. The HINE includes 3 sections containing 26 items that assess different aspects of neurologic function:5,6
- Section 1: Neurologic examination assessing cranial nerve function, posture, movements, tone, reflexes, and reactions
- Section 2: Developmental milestones (head control, sitting, voluntary grasp, ability to kick, rolling, crawling, standing, and walking)
- Section 3: Behavioural assessment (state of consciousness, emotional state, social orientation)
HINE Section 2 (motor milestones) includes 8 items scored on a 5-point scale with 0 as the absence of activity, and a maximum score of 4 points7
- Some items have a maximum score of 2 or 3 points (see table below)
HINE Section 2 scoring chart illustrating the motor developmental milestones7
HINE Section 2 motor milestones achieved in a study of 249 infants without SMA5
Age at achievement |
% reaching milestone |
Motor milestone |
Age at achievement12 months |
% reaching milestone90% |
Motor milestoneAble to maintain head control |
|
79% |
Able to stand unaided |
|
|
51% |
Walk |
|
Age at achievement18 months |
% reaching milestone90% |
Motor milestoneStand/walk unaided |
Motor milestone achievements are rare in infantile-onset (Type I) SMA
In a retrospective study of individuals (n=33) with infantile-onset (Type I) SMA who were 1 to 8 months of age at the onset of symptoms, none of the more severely affected infants achieved a major milestone such as rolling over, independent sitting, crawling, standing, or walking.7
Motor milestones are rarely acquired in infantile-onset SMA. Infants with the most severe symptoms of SMA (early onset) may show a score of 0 on all 8 items of the HINE Section 2.7
More information about the HINE Scale available here
MEASURE: MOTOR FUNCTION
INFANTS AND CHILDREN WITH SMA
( ≈4 months to >4 years of age)
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND) may be used to evaluate the motor skills of infants with SMA:8,9 |
|
|
|
|
Infants with SMA may score significantly lower on CHOP INTEND than unaffected infants
Kolb et al. conducted a prospective, longitudinal natural history study of infants with genetically confirmed SMA that compared their CHOP INTEND scores with those of healthy infants. Age of onset of SMA symptoms ranged from <1 month to 4 to 5 months.4
Patient type |
CHOP INTEND score(average) |
Age at enrolment(average) |
Age of SMA onset |
Patient typeHealthy infants(n=14) |
CHOP INTEND score (average)50.1 points |
Age at enrollment (average)3.3 months |
Age of SMA onset
|
Patient typeInfants with SMA† (n=16)(n=16) |
CHOP INTEND score (average)20.2 points |
Age at enrollment (average)3.7 months |
Age of SMA onset<1 month (6/16)
|
A CHOP INTEND score >40 is rarely observed for symptomatic individuals with infantile-onset
(Type I) SMA who have 2 SMN2 gene copies.11
More information about the CHOP INTEND score is available here.
The Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale—Expanded (HFMSE) is a measure that has been used in several clinical trials to evaluate the motor function of individuals with later-onset (Type II and Type III) SMA |
|
|
The HFMSE includes 13 clinically relevant items from the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) related to lying/rolling, crawling, crawling/kneeling, standing, and walking/running/jumping:3,12,13
Child depicted in graphic above is ≥2 years of age.
|
|
Individuals with later-onset (Type II and Type III) SMA may demonstrate progressive decline in HFMSE scores.3 |
|
|
In one natural history study of SMA, individuals with later-onset SMA declined by 0.56 points (mean) in HFMSE score over 12 months.3 However, in another study of individuals (n=79) with later-onset SMA, motor function appeared to decline in a nonlinear fashion. The mean change in HFMSE scores at 36 months was -1.71 (P=0.01). During the study:14
More information about the HFMSE is available here |
The Upper Limb Module (ULM) was developed to assess aspects of function related to everyday life in nonambulatory individuals with SMA. These skills might only be partly captured by the HFMSE in weaker patients.15The ULM has been validated in the assessment of individuals with SMA (aged 30 months-27 years), including nonambulatory young and weaker children.16 The module includes 9 tasks that can be performed in a brief amount of time (5-10 minutes) using common equipment (e.g., drawing a continuous line with a pencil, picking up a coin and placing in a cup, pressing a button to turn on a lamp, lifting a beverage can to drink, removing the lid from a plastic container, lifting a weight and moving it from circle to circle on pre-printed paper). The maximum score possible is 18.16 |
|
ULM scores may remain relatively stable over a 12-month period.15A study was conducted with nonambulatory individuals (n=74) with later-onset SMA (Type II and Type III); age range was 3.5 to 29 years (mean 10.22, SD 6.15).15 The mean change in ULM at 12 months was 0.04 points (SD 1.17) from baseline (mean 10.23, SD 4.81). Most of the ≥2-point changes in ULM occurred in children who were <5 years of age.15
Changes greater than ±1-2 points in the ULM may be considered clinically relevant.15 More information about the ULM is available here Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM): The ULM was revised to address a ceiling effect and make the test useful in a wider population of individuals with SMA. The RULM consists of a total of 20 items for a maximum score of 37. Activities are graded from 0 to 2.17 |
The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is an objective evaluation of exercise capacity that may be used to assess function in ambulatory individuals with later-onset SMA18
| |
Progressive decline in 6MWT may occur in later-onset SMA.19One study of ambulatory individuals with later-onset (Type III) SMA demonstrated a reduction More information about 6MWT is available here |
- Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) response is a measure of the electrophysiologic output from a specific muscle or muscle group following stimulation of the innervating nerve21
- Motor unit number estimation (MUNE) is a method that estimates the number of motor units‡ involved in the contraction of a specific muscle22
‡Motor units include motor neurons and the muscle fibres they innervate.23
CMAP may decrease rapidly in some individuals with SMA20
Trend lines represent CMAP declines in individuals with SMA. The shaded area indicates estimated normal values.
Adapted from Swoboda et al.20
In a clinical study, the average CMAP peak amplitude for infants with SMA was 1.4 mV (SD=2.2, n=25) compared with 5.5 mV in healthy infants (SD=2.0, n=27; P<0.01).4
Natural history studies among patients with Type I SMA demonstrate that CMAP amplitude is abnormally low and does not improve after symptom onset24
Green dots indicate children who were identified presymptomatically via genetic testing because a sibling was previously diagnosed with SMA.
Adapted from Swoboda et al.20
REFERENCES
1. Finkel RS, et al. Neurology. 2014;83:810–7. 2. Darras BT, et al. Neuromuscular Disorders of Infancy, Childhood, and Adolescence: A Clinician’s Approach. 2nd ed. London, UK: Elsevier; 2015. 3. Mercuri E, et al. Neuromuscul Disord. 2016;26:123–31. 4. Kolb SJ, et al. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016;3:132–45. 5. Haataja L, et al. J Pediatr. 1999;135:153–61. 6. Romeo DM, et al. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:240–5. 7. De Sanctis R, et al. Neuromuscul Disord. 2016;26:754–9. 8. Glanzman AM, et al. Neuromuscul Disord. 2010;20:155–61. 9. Glanzman AM, et al. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011;23:322–6. 10. Spinal Muscular Atrophy Clinical Research Center. CHOP INTEND for SMA Type I score sheet. Available at: http://columbiasma.org/links.html. Accessed November 2017. 11. Finkel RS, et al. Lancet. 2016; 388:3017–26. 12. Glanzman AM, et al. J Child Neurol. 2011;26:1499–507. 13. The Pediatric Neuromuscular Clinical Research Network for SMA. Expanded Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale for SMA (HFMSE). Available at: http://columbiasma.org/links.html. Accessed November 2017. 14. Kaufmann P, et al. Neurology. 2012;79:1889–97. 15. Sivo S, et al. Neuromuscul Disord. 2015;25:212–5. 16. Mazzone E, et al. Neuromuscul Disord. 2011;21:406–12. 17. Mazzone ES, et al. Muscle Nerve. 2017;55:869–74. 18. Montes J, et al. Neurology. 2010;74:833–8. 19. Mazzone E, et al. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013;23:624–8. 20. Swoboda KJ, Prior TW, Scott CB, et al. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:704–12. 21. Arnold WD, et al. J Vis Exp. 2015;103:1-8. 22. Bromberg MB, Swoboda KJ. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25:445–7. 23. Monti RJ, et al. Muscle Nerve. 2001;1;24:848–66. 24. Finkel RS. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013;23:112–5.